Tag: Divorce

No email was ever answered.”

“I was clueless about the process.”

“I didn’t feel they understood enough about abuse.” 

For hundreds of women and men navigating the divorce process in the Jewish court (beit din) each year, the journey is full of roadblocks. There is confusion about how the system works. Courts and judges lack training on domestic abuse, and the pressure to give in to unreasonable demands in exchange for a bill of divorce (“get”) and the freedom it brings is constant. Many women feel they are going through it alone, without the support and guidance of their leaders, communities, and the Jewish world at large.

To better understand where the system can improve, we created a survey to collect hard data about people’s experiences with the process of divorce in batei din around the world. Responses poured in from people around the Jewish world: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, South Africa, Australia, Israel, Brazil, and more.

When we created the “Beit Din Experience Survey,” we knew the results would be difficult to see. But we were not prepared for the heartbreak, grief, anger, and regret that are in the responses, which have been pouring in.

“He was violent, and I ended up in a shelter with my child and they wouldn’t help.”

“I was forced to sign away my marital property and much more in exchange for a get.

Get-abuse is a serious problem all over the world, in every denomination and segment of the Jewish community. This abuse has many faces. It can look like financial extortion. It can manifest in demands on custody agreements. It can present as a demand to give up the rights to one’s marital home. When the full picture of get-abuse becomes clear, what becomes even clearer is that it is far more common and far-reaching than we think.

But we also know that when batei din have proper training, oversight, and accountability, they can provide fair and wise forums for navigating difficult divorces. We know that when communities take proactive steps to address get-refusal by implementing tools such as halachic prenups and synagogue bylaws, instances of get-abuse go down. We know that by refusing to stay silent on this critical issue, agunot (the women chained in unwanted marriages) will not have to struggle alone — instead, they will feel the love and support of all of the Jewish people behind them.

The Jewish community does not have to — and indeed must not — accept get-refusal in our midst. The sanctity of Jewish marriage is severely damaged when women wait years for their freedom. Unlike tragedies that strike at random, get-refusal is something we can solve, if we, as a community, are determined to do so.

* * *

As we observe International Agunah Day, remember that, like Esther and Mordechai, you can be the voice our community needs to address this injustice. See our Ten Commandments of Gett Abuse below, print a copy for your shul or organization, and together let’s remove the nightmare of get-refusal from our midst, and create a community where Jewish marriage has integrity and no one is held hostage or abused in the name of Torah.

The 10 Commandments of Get-Refusal

To demonstrate each commandment, we have excerpted a real survey response from people who have personal experience in a Jewish divorce court.

  1. Sign a halachic prenup/postnup
    “I did not have a prenup and the man I married was an abusive criminal.”

2. Hold leaders accountable 
“The dayanim (judges) need to understand that they are dealing with very vulnerable people.”
“I was repeatedly singled out and shamed because I was a woman asking for a divorce.”

3. Insist on transparency in the process
“They delayed the date three times”
“There was a lack of steady communication.”
“I didn’t get guidance beforehand.”

4. Encourage shuls to make a public and enforced policy against get-refusal
“I didn’t’ feel like there was any support.”
“This process truly turned me away from Orthodoxy.”

5. Urge leaders to speak about get-abuse from the pulpit
“I never feel listened to.”
“My (ex) husband started to say something about withholding the get, and the rabbi cut him short and said, very firmly, “We are not going there.”

6. Do NOT allow abusers to feel comfortable in your community.
“The issue is that the beit din does not understand narcissistic abuse.”
“They did not understand how he was being abusive and using them to manipulate me.”

7. Do NOT make excuses
“They contacted my ex about the get. He says he is not withholding, but waiting and the beit din will do nothing.”

8. Do NOT allow extortion for the sake of a get
“The sad fact is that I had to pay extortion fees for my get, and even today, I am still paying off the debt.”
“All the things that happened were out of fear that he would make me agunah. I ultimately gave up asking for any money because of that fear.”
“At one point, a rabbi told me that I had a gun to my head so to speak — that I should give in to the guy’s demands.”

9. Do NOT stand idly by
“He was violent and they wouldn’t help.”

10. Do NOT allow abuse in the name of Torah
“There was no sensitivity to my survival of domestic abuse.”

* * *

The Ten Commandments of Gett Abuse and this survey are a joint project of Chochmat Nashim, GettOutUK, and ORA — three organizations in three countries which see the same failures in the system, and the same opportunities for change in the community.

The future of Jewish marriage matters to us all. And contrary to what many say, agunot do not have to be an inevitable part of Judaism. The women and men chained in marriage today are not victims of tragedy, but victims of abuse. We can, and must, end this shame by refusing to accept get-refusal and by insisting on proper training for the courts’ judges.

Please join us.

If you would like to sign a halahic pre- or postnup to add your voices to the thousands who want to see an end to get-abuse, write to info@chochmatnashim.org with your name and the country in which you live.

If you have experience seeking divorce in the beit din, add your voice to the survey in English outside of Israel, for experience in Israel, or in French for batei din outside of Israel.

The above was co-authored by Shoshanna Keats Jaskoll (Chochmat Nashim), Keshet Starr (ORA), and Ramie Smith (GettOutUK). 

Originally published on The Times of Israel

Zvia Gordetsky has waited 17 years to be free of the man who prefers jail to granting her a divorce. Her case is unusual because unlike what happens too often, the religious courts did nearly everything they “should” do, and still she is not free.

Normally in Israel, where the religious courts have power to punish withholders, a woman only waits for a get because the court did not order the husband to give her one. In this case, within six months of asking for a divorce, the religious court ordered Zvia’s husband to grant it. When he refused, they told him he would be put in jail. He showed up to the next hearing with a packed suitcase, ready to move into prison. Since then, he has been offered the chance to grant the divorce — and leave prison — every six months. His response is: “They won’t break me.”

That the “system” worked as it should and Zvia — who told me her story personally — is still chained, has made this case shocking to those who are used to tragic stories of get abuse. That Zvia has chosen the desperate act of a hunger strike for her freedom makes it clear that she feels everything else has failed.

Read more in the UK Jewish Chronicle

Too often, we speak of the plight of the agunah as if it were an inevitable, albeit tragic, fact of life. Like cancer or a natural disaster, we are passive in the face of this devastating misfortune. It could happen to anyone, we say.

MK Aliza Lavie

MK Aliza Lavie

Every year, the special “Misheberach [Prayer] for the Agunahcirculates on social media as we plead God to alleviate the agunah’s suffering. Some even cite the fixture of the agunah as a testament to a community’s piety, the noble victim whose “sacrifice is a public, ongoing reaffirmation of the legitimacy and inviolability of the religious laws surrounding marriage and divorce.” A prominent halachist famously remarked that the unsolved agunah problem was his own “personal akedah,” evoking Abraham’s morally conflicted sacrifice of his son. Just yesterday, in a special Knesset meeting, one woman proposed to enshrine the status of agunah as a special legal category as a way for agunot to obtain eligibility for single mother benefits from the state.

Former MK Dov Lipman

Former MK Dov Lipman

As a community, we have settled — uncomfortably — into the reality that the agunah problem is one to be managed, not solved.

By treating it as a divine decree, however — an act of God rather than an aggression of man — we exempt ourselves from liability or claims of negligence. Our personal agency does not even factor into the equation. Such thinking leads to the types of “solutions” mentioned above — ones that express sympathy or even outrage but are always looking back, reactively, to a problem.

 

 

 

Read more on the Times of Israel

Rachel Stomel

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]12068458_595773760578240_7239438798400265474_o (1)For International Agunah Day, Chochmat Nashim launched a visibility campaign, highlighting agunot and former agunot. We asked these women to take selfies holding signs that note the number of years they were denied a get (Jewish writ of divorce), their location and the hashtag‪#‎NoMoreChains‬. The aim of this campaign is to recognize their first-person narratives as valid, relevant and not shameful. The campaign literally puts faces to the stories and humanizes the statistics. The photos also showcase the diversity of agunot in age, location, religious observance and communal affiliation to underscore the fact that the agunah problem is pervasive in all segments of the Jewish world.

This Agunah Day, we’re shifting the conversation. Let’s recognize that agunot are people with their own experiences, rights and inherent value. Let’s acknowledge that every agunah story is as unique as the person who lives it. Let’s recognize that agunot are entitled to freedom and integrity irrespective of others’ validation of their suffering.

solidarityThis Agunah Day, about a dozen women are making a very private experience public.

Enough with the noble, silent victim role. Here’s to open conversation, demanding justice as a right–not a favor–and the freedom to take ownership of our own stories.

Read the complete essay about our campaign here: Agunah Day: Stepping Out from Behind the Mask

View the images on Facebook here.

 

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Dozens of people on my Facebook feed are sharing this meme today from a page called Unchain My Heart. I’d like to relay a conversation I had with Rabbi Jeremy Stern of Organization for the Resolution of Agunot (ORA) regarding Blu Greenberg’s famous criticism of the rabbinic failure to solve the agunah problem, saying that “If there’s a rabbinic will, there’s a halachic way” and how this relates to the halachic prenup.

Meme from the Facebook group “Unchain My Heart”

Rabbi Stern explained that in all these cases where we circumvent the consequences of a mitzvah de’oraita (such as mechirat chametz, pruzbol, various eruvin, etc), the “loophole” must be set in motion before the mitzvah begins to take effect. You can’t enact a pruzbol after shmitta has begun and you can’t sell your chametz once it’s already Pesach. Why?

Because in all these cases, we are not changing halacha; rather, we are changing reality so that a different set of halachot apply.

This is how the Halachic Prenup works. The prenup does not force the mitzvah of giving of a get; rather it amplifies the mitzvah of spousal support during a marriage. That is why the prenup must be signed before the wedding (or during the marriage as a post-nup). Once divorce proceedings have begun, absent a prenup, there is very little one can do on a halachic front in cases of get refusal. This is why ORA pushes so strongly for prenups. It’s much easier to prevent a disaster than to pick up the pieces. (Here ends the extent of the conversation with Rabbi Stern.)

There are, however, halachic mechanisms that do exist after the fact. These include annulments, invocation of mekach ta’ut, omdana d’mokhach and others (there is also the route of eschewing kinyan in kiddushin altogether, but that is a longer conversation). Obviously, these halachic mechanisms can only be used when the situation warrants it. The problem is when the situation warrants it but we worry more about slippery slopes, political criticism, loss of authority, conceding to feminists or the defeatist contention that “it’s just not done.”

But it has been done, it is being done and it will be done. Yes, we need courageous rabbis and dayanim to step up to the plate. But what we can do as a community is to create the social awareness to cultivate an environment that is receptive and conducive to these decisions. Without the proper social atmosphere, even the best ideas and most constructive policies will have little impact on the ground.

Within the Jewish community, so much of social policy is shaped not by imposing legislation from the outside but by shifting communal norms from the inside. Especially in Israel, many people mistakenly conflate religious institutions and religious authority figures with religion itself, and are therefore hesitant to criticize injustices committed in their name. Out of reverence for Torah and tradition, people inadvertently stand by while that very Torah and tradition they hold so dear becomes a mockery and even a tool of oppression.

This is where we, as a community, step in and say, it doesn’t have to be this way.

We have more power than we think. Let’s use it.

 

–Rachel Stomel[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Search